Disposed
Gopal Lachhmandas Raheja and Anr. v. Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja and 4 Ors.
Bombay HCCOMIP/27/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
1 19-chscd-344.17 & ors.doc IN THE HIGH…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
bipin prithiani
1
19-chscd-344.17 & ors.doc
BIPIN DHARMENDERPRITHIANI Digitally signed by BIPINDHARMENDER PRITHIANIDate: 2024.02.17 10:39:03 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 27 OF 2007
Gopal Lachhmandas Raheja & Anr.
Versus Suresh Lachhmandas Raheja & Ors
… Plaintiffs
… Defendants
WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 5 OF 2010 WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2 OF 2007 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 344 OF 2017
WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 576 OF 2010 WITH CHAMBER ORDER NO. 398 OF 2014 IN
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 27 OF 2007
Mr. Hiren Kamod a/w Hrushi Narvekar, Zahra Padamsee, Sanidhya Arora and Uttara Jhaveri i/by Vashi & Vashi for the Plaintiffs.
Mr. Aditya Mehta a/w Ms. Sraddha Kedia and Mr. Sagam Mehta i/by M/s. Rashmikant and Partners for the Applicant in CHSCD/ 344/2017.
Mr. Bharat Zaveri i/by Kanga and Company for the Defendant Nos.1 to 5 for CHSCD/344/2017, NMCD/5/2010, CHOL/398/ 2014 and COMIP/27/2007.
CORAM: MANISH PITALE, J.
DATE : 16th FEBRUARY, 2024
bipin prithiani
2
19-chscd-344.17 & ors.doc
P.C. :
. In this suit, there are two plaintiffs. Plaintiff No.1 expired and plaintiff No.2 desires to withdraw the suit.
MANISH PITALE, J.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court