The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed the withdrawal of Company Appeal No. 29 of 2014 following a settlement between the parties, with the appeal and pending applications disposed of as withdrawn.
The appeal was disposed of as withdrawn; pending applications also stood disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
903.COAPP.29.2014.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2014
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1142 OF 2020
IN
COMPANY APPEAL NO. 29 OF 2014
Pravin Umesh Mirajkar & Anr.
...Appellants
Versus
SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI
Digitally signed by SHRIKANT SHRINIVAS MALANI Date: 2024.01.10 17:54:45 +0530
Powertherm Capacitors (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Or. ...Respondents ***
Mr. Siddhesh Pilannkar i/b Dr. Uday Warunjikar, for Appellants. Ms. Vidhi Chikhal i/b Satyan Israni, for Respondents.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J DATE : 10th JANUARY, 2024.
P. C. :
(MANISH PITALE, J.)
Page1 of 1
Shrikant
Pravin Umesh Mirajkar & Anr.
Shrikant Shrinivas Malani
Powertherm Capacitors (India) Pvt. Ltd.
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
