Tex Fab India v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Procedural chamber order in a writ petition matter: the petitioner's advocate stated an additional affidavit explaining delay in filing the chamber order had been filed in the department and served on the respondents; statements were accepted and the matter stood adjourned to a further date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Before : Sachin B. Bhansali Prothonotary and Senior Master
Date : 9th August, 2024
FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL :
- CHOL/350/2024 IN WP(L)/8097/2023
- ) Mr. Aman Mishra i/b. M/s. UBR Legal, Advocate for ) Petitioner / Applicant
- )
- ) Mr. Dhananjay Deshmukh, Advocate for ) Respondents )
- ) P.C. : Ld. Advocate for Petitioner / Applicant made ) a statement that he has filed Addl. Affidavit in the ) department, explaining delay in filing present ) Chamber Order. He further made a statement that ) he has served copy of Chamber Order upon ) Advocate for Respondents and individually on ) Respondents. Statements are accepted.
- )
- ) Ld. Advocate for Respondents made a statement that ) he is not on panel since empanelled Advocates are ) now changed by the Respondent. Statement is ) accepted.
- )
Coram
Sachin B. Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · A. H. Laddhad Prothonotary Senior Master
- Order 2 · A. H. Laddhad Prothonotary Senior Master
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court