Allowed

Sajjan S/O Zitru Parshive and Others v. the Western Coalfields Ltd., Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others

Bombay HC27 Mar 2024CAW/923/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Nagpur allowed civil applications seeking permission to amend writ petitions to correct misquoted provisions in the prayer clause to record subsequent events and additional grounds. Respondents were granted time to reply.

What did the court decide?

Applications for amendment were allowed; amendment to be carried out within one week; respondents entitled to file submissions within three weeks thereafter.

Sajjan S/O Zitru Parshive and Others vs the… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:3673-DB

¶2

1 1-CAW 673-24 & 925-24 in WP 621-23 +.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NOS. 673/2024 & 925/2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 621OF 2023

¶6

CHETAN S/O. MARUTI PASARE AND ORS.

¶7

...Vs...

¶8

THE WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD., WCL HEAD QUARTER, NAGPUR THR. C.M.D. AND ORS.

¶9

WITH

¶10

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NOS. 676/2024 & 924/2024

¶11

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO. 884 OF 2023

¶13

AKSHAY S/O. RAMESH THAKRE AND ORS.

¶14

...Vs...

¶15

THE WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD., WCL HEAD QUARTER, NAGPUR THR. C.M.D. AND ORS.

¶16

WITH

¶17

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NOS. 677/2024 & 923/2024

¶18

¶19

WRIT PETITION NO. 4989 OF 2023

¶20

SAJJAN S/O. ZITRU PARSHIVE AND ORS.

¶21

...Vs...

¶22

THE WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD., WCL HEAD QUARTER, NAGPUR THR. C.M.D. AND ORS.

¶23

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's orders Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶24

In WP No. 621/2023

¶25

Shri P.V.Bansod, Advocate along with Shri Sanyal, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Anand Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for respondent no. 1. In WP No. 884/2023

¶26

Shri P.V.Bansod, Advocate along with Shri Sanyal, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Anand Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Ms. Meghna Munshi, Advocate for respondent no. 2. In WP No. 4989/2023 Shri P.V.Bansod, Advocate along with Shri Sanyal, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Anand Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Shri P.V.Navlani, Advocate for respondent no. 2. In WP No. 4266/2023 Mrs. D.I.Charlewar, Advocate for petitioners. Shri Anand Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for respondent no. 5. Shri A.J.Dhoble, Advocate for respondent nos. 6 to 9. Shri S.C.Mehadia, Advocate for respondent nos. 10 to 13.

¶27

2 1-CAW 673-24 & 925-24 in WP 621-23 +.odt

¶28

In WP No. 4375/2023

¶29

Shri Anand Jaiswal, Sr. Advocate a/b. Shri C.S.Samudra, Advocate for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

¶30

Shri I.S.Charlewar, Advocate for Proposed Intervenor.

¶31

CORAM: ANIL S. KILOR AND

¶32

SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, JJ.

¶33

DATED : 27^th MARCH, 2024.

¶34

By these applications, the petitioners seek permission to amend the petition.

¶35

By first amendment application, it is submitted that, due to inadvertent mistake, some provisions of law are not properly quoted in the prayer clause and therefore, the applicants want to amend the prayer clause to that effect. By second amendment application, the petitioners want to place on record the subsequent events and additional grounds which were raised during the pendency of the petition.

¶36

There is no objection to the other side to allow the present applications. As such, the applications are allowed. The amendment to be carried out within a period of one week.

¶37

The respondents are entitled to file additional submissions to the amended petition within a period of three weeks thereafter.

¶38

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

¶39

3 1-CAW 673-24 & 925-24 in WP 621-23 +.odt

¶40

WRIT PETITION NOS. 621/2023, 884/2023, 4989/2023, 4266/2023 AND 4375/ 2023

¶41

List all these petitions after four weeks along with Writ Petition No. 6062/2023.

¶42

(SMT. M.S.JAWALKAR, J.)

¶43

(ANIL S. KILOR, J.)

¶44

B.T.Khapekar

¶45

Signed by: Mr. B.T. Khapekar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 27/03/2024 17:11:08

Sajjan S/O Zitru Parshive and Others v. the Western Coalfields Ltd., Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajjan S/O Zitru Parshive and Others v. the Western Coalfields Ltd., Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil S/O Shivkumar Dubey Vs Election Commission of India, Thr. Chief Election Commissioner and Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Inderjeet S/O Haridas Ramteke Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Public Works Dept. Mumbai and Another

Salman Khan Shafiullah Khan vs Pharmacy Council of India, Thr. Secretary, New Delhi and Others

Ashish Nanaji Badole Vs State of Maha. Thr. Its Ministry of Revenue and Forest, Mumbai and Others

Chetan S/O Maruti Pasare and Others vs the Western Coalfields Ltd., Wcl Head Quarter, Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others

Akshay S/O. Ramesh Thakre and Others vs the Western Coalfields Ltd., Wcl Head Quarter, Nagpur Thr. C.M.D. and Others