A writ petition concerning a bank loan matter was taken up with no appearance by the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent bank stated the entire loan amount had been repaid and a no-dues certificate issued, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
212-WP-4804-1997.docx
rrpillai
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4804 OF 1997 WITH
WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 1997
Trimoorti Sahakari Bank Ltd. … Petitioner
Vs.
Deccan Industrial Electronics … Respondents Pvt. Ltd. and Others
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 59 OF 2001 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4804 OF 1997
Madhav Ganesh Palnitkar … Application Vs. Trimoorti Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Others … Respondents
WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 905 OF 2007 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 4810 OF 1997
Mrs. Pratibha H. Palnitkar … Application Vs. Trimoorti Sahakari Bank Ltd. and Others … Respondents
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 1st FEBRUARY 2024
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Jain i/b. Mr. Kishore Tembe for Respondent No. 4. Mr. S. V. Sadavarte for Respondent Nos. 1, 3, 5 and 7. Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for the State.
Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAJESHWARI RAMESH RAMESH PILLAI PILLAI Date: 2024.02.02 10:55:13 +0530
1/2
212-WP-4804-1997.docx
P.C.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Trimoorti Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Deccan Industrial Electronics Pvt. Ltd.
Madhav Ganesh Palnitkar
Mrs. Pratibha H. Palnitkar
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court