Allowed

Brijkishore Rambilas Maniyar v. Bureau of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Bombay HC16 Dec 2024CAW/3179/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner with an outstanding Look Out Circular sought leave to travel to Dubai; earlier permissions had been granted. The court permitted foreign travel from 18/12/2024 to 23/12/2024 subject to his undertaking and payment of Rs.75,000 costs, suspending the circular for that period, and allowed the application.

What did the court decide?

Permission to travel to Dubai 18/12/2024–23/12/2024; LOC not implemented for that period, subject to undertaking and Rs.75,000 costs.

Brijkishore Rambilas Maniyar Vs Bureau of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 23-wp 4991.2023.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.3179 OF 2024 IN

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4991 OF 2023

¶4

( Brijkishore Rambilas Maniyar vs. Bureau of Immigration and others )

¶5

Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of direction, Court's or Judge's order and the Registrar's orders.

¶6

Mr. D.V. Chavan, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr.Chaitanya Dhruv, Advocate for the petitioner.

¶7

Mr. N.S. Deshpande, Deputy Solicitor General of India, with Ms Upasna Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

¶8

Mr. Aashray Chaudhari, Advocate with Mr. S.N. Kumar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶9

Mr. U.A. Gosavi, Advocate for the respondent No.4

¶10

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE AND

¶11

ABHAY J. MANTRI JJ.

¶12

DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2024

¶13

Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the application and record.

¶14

By this application, the applicant again seeks leave to travel to Dubai from 18/12/2024 to 23/12/2024 as the respondents issued a Look Out Circular against him.

¶15

It seems that earlier, by orders dated 11/08/2023, 08/09/2023, and 17/05/2024, this Court granted permission to the petitioner to travel abroad subject to compliance with the undertaking.

¶16

Having considered the same, as per the undertaking given by the applicant/petitioner as per the order dated 11/08/2023, we deem it appropriate to permit him to travel abroad subject to the petitioner paying costs of Rs.75,000/- in

¶17

2 23-wp 4991.2023.doc

¶18

the light of the order dated 11/08/2023, to be deposited to the High Court Bar Association Library, Nagpur.

¶19

Thus, it is directed that the lookout circular issued at the behest of respondent No.3 shall not be implemented for the period from 18/12/2024 to 23/12/2024. The petitioner is permitted to travel to Dubai subject to compliance with the undertaking mentioned in ‘Ground E’ in the writ petition. On returning back, the petitioner shall attend the Office of respondent No.3.

¶20

The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for Respondent No.1 and learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to communicate this order to the respective parties for necessary steps to be taken.

¶21

Mr. Chavan, learned Senior Counsel, submits that the matter can be disposed of at the next hearing.

¶22

The application is allowed in terms of the aforesaid order and disposed of.

¶23

The parties are to act upon the authenticated copy of this order.

¶24

Stand over to 20/12/2024 .

¶25

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (AVINASH G. GHAROTE J.)

¶26

KOLHE

Brijkishore Rambilas Maniyar v. Bureau of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brijkishore Rambilas Maniyar v. Bureau of Immigration, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Thr. Commissioner and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharat Petroleum Co. Ltd., Mumbai vs Sanjeev v. Chimote (Huf) Thr. Karta Sanjay Chimote and Others

Ganesh S/O Tukaram Kharche vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of General Administration, Mumbai and Another

Krishna S/O Damodar Landge vs Western Coal Fields Limited, Thr. Chairman-Cum-Managing Director, Nagpur and Ors.

Aziz S/O Hasambhai Barde Vs the Collector, Yavatmal

Pawan S/O Ramkrushna Gawande and Others Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Social Welfare and Justice Dept. Mumbai and Others

Parimal W/O. Vishram Moharir and Another vs the State of Maha. through Principal Secretary, Aseemkumar Gupta, Urban Devpt., Mumbai and Ors.