Interim civil application in a pending writ petition sought stay of the impugned order regarding Survey No.119/2. The court extended non-implementation of that order for one month and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 caw2458.24.O.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.2458 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.975 OF 2024 (D)
(Shipra Arvind Khorgade Vs. The Naib Tahsildar, Saoner and another)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar’s Orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
Mr. Rahul Dhande, Advocate for Petitioner. Ms. Deepali Sapkal, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Mr. P. V. Dandwate, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM: N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE: 19th SEPTEMBER, 2024.
For the reasons stated in the application the order impugned in the writ petition shall not be implemented in respect of Survey No.119/2 for the period of one more month.
2. The application is disposed of.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
NSN
Shipra Arvind Khorgade
The Naib Tahsildar, Saoner
Respondent No.2
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
