Disposed

Prashant S/O Jaywantrao Katole v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director

Bombay HC22 Nov 2024CAW/2416/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil application seeking modification of an earlier order deferring consideration of the petitioner's tribe claim pending a related civil appeal. The court permitted the Scrutiny Committee to decide the claim on available facts and documents, subject to the appeal's result, and extended service protection by two months.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted for Scrutiny Committee to decide tribe claim; service protection extended two months.

Prashant S/O Jaywantrao Katole Vs the Scheduled Tribes Caste… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:12708-DB

¶2

1 01-wp 6705.2019(D).odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO.2416 OF 2024 IN

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 6705 OF 2019 (D)

¶6

( Prashant Jayawantrao Katole vs. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati and another )

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memorandum of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Mr. Ashwin Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. I. J. Damle, AGP for respondent/State.

¶9

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : NOVEMBER 22 , 2024

¶10

The Civil Application 2416 of 2024 seeks modification of the order dated 15/01/2020 passed in Writ Petition No.6705/2019, in which the decision of the Caste Scrutiny Committee dated 10/04/2019 (page 31) deferring the consideration of the tribe claim of the petitioner therein, in view of pendency of Civil Appeal No.10240 of 2014, which is in respect of one of the members of the Katole family, is being sought to be modified, seeking permission to decide the claim of the petitioner on merits.

¶11

Both the learned Counsel for the parties herein, are agreeable that the claim can be decided based upon the facts and documents available with the Committee in terms of the law applicable, in view of which, we grant permission to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the tribe claim of the petitioner in Writ Petition No.6705/2019, which would be equally applicable to all members of the Katole family, which would however, be subject to the result of the Civil Appeal No.10240 of 2014.

¶12

2 01-wp 6705.2019(D).odt

¶13

It is also made clear, that the services of the petitioner which are as of now protected would continue to remain protected for a period of two moths further in case the decision of the Committee is against the petitioner. Application is disposed of.

¶14

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)

¶15

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶16

KOLHE

Prashant S/O Jaywantrao Katole v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prashant S/O Jaywantrao Katole v. the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary and Dy. Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parag Vasant Amle Vs Teh State of Maharashtra Thr. P.S.O., P.S. Ajni, Dist. Nagpur and Anohter

Mayuri W/O. Ravindra Meshram vs Coal India Limited, Thr. Its Chairman, Jbcci-Xi, Rajarghat, Kolkatta and Others

Leben Life Sciences Private Ltd., Akola Thr. Managing Director, Naresh S/O Nitilal Shah vs State of Maha., Dept. of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Mumbai Thr. Chief Secretary and Ors.

Bandu Panjabrao Choudhari and Others Vs the Collector, Nagpur and Others

Niwrutti S/O Ramaji Ninawe vs the Collector, Nagpur and Others

Trupti W/O. Prabhakar Kawale vs State of Maha., Thr. Secretary, School Education and Sports Dept., Mumbai and Anr.