Disposed

Shivkumar S/O Ramvilas Kaithwas v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Commissioner, District Caste Certicate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Bombay HC20 Sept 2024CAW/2227/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee sought modification of an earlier order in a caste certificate verification matter. The court declined the requested replacement and granted a final four-week extension of time, stating no further extension would be allowed.

What did the court decide?

Time extended by four weeks; no further extension allowed.

Shivkumar S/O Ramvilas Kaithwas Vs State of Maharashtra… — Caste Atrocities | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 906 caw2227.24.odt

¶2

2024:BHC-NAG:10553-DB

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.(CAW) NO.2227/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3289/2024 (DECIDED)

¶5

Shivkumar Ramvilas Kaithwas Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Commissioner, District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati.

¶6

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,

¶7

appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order and Registrar's orders.

¶8

Mr. D.N.Mudgale, Advocate for petitioner.

¶9

Mr. H.D.Marathe, AGP for respondent (applicant).

¶10

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 20, 2024.

¶11

Heard.

¶12

This Civil Application is moved by the respondent-District Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee needs to be allowed by replacing para 3 of the order dated 11^th July, 2024, which reads thus:

¶13

“The petitioner belongs to “PAASI” Scheduled Caste and the proceedings are governed by the provisions of the Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, De-notified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificate Rules, 2012. Rule 12 of the said Rules reads thus:

¶14

“12. Constitution of Vigilance Cell :

¶15

(1) There shall be a Vigilance Cell to assist each Scrutiny Committee in conducting the field inquiry under rule 17. The Vigilance Cell shall consist of-

¶16

(a) Deputy Superintendent of Police or equivalent;

¶17

2 906 caw2227.24.odt

¶18

(b) Police Inspectors;

¶19

(c) Police constables to assist the Police Inspectors.

¶20

(2)Jurisdiction of the Vigilance Cell shall be subject to territorial jurisdiction of concerned Scrutiny Committee, for all purposes, including domestic inquiry and verification of authenticity of documents;

¶21

Provided that, in appropriate case, if Scrutiny Committee feels, it may solicit a report of Vigilance Inquiry, from any other concerned Scrutiny Committee.

¶22

(3) Vigilance Cell shall work under the control and supervision of concerned Caste Scrutiny Committee”.

¶23

By way of last indulgence, we extend the time by four weeks from today with an understanding that no further extension on whatsoever count shall be allowed.

¶24

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.)

¶25

(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

¶26

Mukund Ambulkar

Shivkumar S/O Ramvilas Kaithwas v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Commissioner, District Caste Certicate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivkumar S/O Ramvilas Kaithwas v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Commissioner, District Caste Certicate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savitribai Fule Mahila Matsayavyavasay Sahkari Sanstha, Thr. President Surekha W/O Deepak Khadse Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Ministry of Fisheries, Daily Deve.and Animal Husbandary and Ot

Smt. Lajwanti Wd/O Fagunmal Motwani and Another Vs Nagar Parishad, Pulgaon, Wardha Thr. Its Chief Officer and Others

Mrs. Sheela Kanti Singhee and Others Vs Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur through Its Municipal Commissioner and Others

Shubham Vijay Bagde Vs the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secy.

Juhi Umeshrao Gajapure Vs Nagarjuna Institute of Technology and Management, Thr. Principal and Ors.

Vidarbha Mahila Welfare Society, Jalgaon Jamod, Thr. Secretary, Buldhana Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of School Education, Mumbai and Ors.