Civil application in a pending writ petition seeking extension regarding the six-month period fixed by the Court for decision of a Revenue Revision. The Court found the fixed period reasonable and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 2caw2123.2024..odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, AT NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2123 OF 2024 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 3667 OF 2024 (D)
(Shri Suresh Wasudeorao Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra and others)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders
Court's or Judge's orders
Mr. S.S. Patil, Advocate for applicant/petitioner.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ. DATED : 20-08 -2024
This civil application stands disposed of as the period of six months fixed by this Court for decision in the Revenue Revision is quite reasonable.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Belkhede
Suresh Wasudeorao Patil
State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
Abhay J. Mantri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
