Allowed

Girish Prabhakarrao Kale v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC17 May 2024CAW/1456/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the petitioner, whose service approval was cancelled pending a pending application, to fill training forms and attend a conditional State Council of Educational Research and Training course, subject to the outcome of the current petition.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was allowed to fill the online forms and attend the training subject to the result of the petition.

Girish Prabhakarrao Kale vs State of Maharashtra, Thr… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:5739

¶2

1 909C.caw.1456.24

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO. 1456 OF 2024 AND

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.7698/2022

¶6

Girish Prabhakarrao Kale Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

¶7

¶8

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders

¶9

- - - - Mr. Apurv De, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. J. Y. Ghurde, A.G.P. for the Non-applicant/State. Mr. Prashant Gode, Advocate for Non-applicant Nos.5 and 6.

¶10

CORAM : MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI,J. DATED : 17/05/2024.

¶11

. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent Nos.2 and 3 cancelling the approval of the services granted to the petitioner after a span of 22 long years of service of respondent No. 6 – School. By the interim order, the present petitioner is in service and getting salary.

¶12

There is a Selection Grade training organized by State Council of Educational Research and Training, Pune which is under the aegis of the respondent No.1 – State, in May/June 2024. The petitioner is coming before this Court to allow him to fill-up the online forms for attending said training. There is possibility that link will be opened for filling up the form during the period of 3^rd week of June 2024.

¶13

Learned A.G.P. opposed the application stating that petitioner’s approval was cancelled after the enquiry. It will cause no any loss to the petitioner, if he has not attended the training this year. He can attend it as it is

¶14

2 909C.caw.1456.24

¶15

frequently conducted by the respondents.

¶16

Heard both the learned Counsel.

¶17

One of the clauses for filling up the form is that there should not be any litigation of the applicant while filling-up the form for training. The petition is pending before this Court. As the link would open from next week, the petitioner is allowed to fill-up the form and attend the training subject to the result of this petition.

¶18

Stand over to 21.06.2024.

¶19

(MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.)

¶20

RGurnule

¶21

Signed by: Mrs. R.M. MANDADE Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/05/2024 18:20:10

Girish Prabhakarrao Kale v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Girish Prabhakarrao Kale v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vasudeo @ Vasu Mahadeo Satav vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Its Pso, Nandura Tq. Nandura, Dist. Buldhana

Vinod S/O Gunwantrao Bhokte vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Pso Ps Deoli, Tq. Deoli, Dist. Wardha

Amit S/O Pradip Satao vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Nandura Tq. Nandura, Dist. Buldhana

Sanjaykumar Wamanrao Zade vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Dinesh Krushnarao Kohare vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Dept. of Education, Mumbai and Others

Shubham Vinod Jaiswal vs the State of Maharashtra Thr. Nandura Tq. Nandura, Dist. Buldhana