Dismissed

Smt. Chandrakala Wd/O Sahebrao Dhone and Others v. Smt. Sunanda W/O Bhujangrao Mohod and Another

Bombay HC9 Aug 2024CAW/1413/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought relaxation of a stay condition requiring yearly deposits during appeal against an eviction decree. The court held the monthly-equivalent sum was not onerous since they continued cultivating the agricultural land, and rejected the application.

What did the court decide?

None granted; civil application seeking relaxation of deposit condition was rejected.

Smt. Chandrakala Wd/O Sahebrao Dhone and Others Vs… — Execution and Attachment | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

2024:BHC-NAG:8759-DB

¶2

CAW 1413 of 2024.odt

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶5

CIVIL APPLICATION (CAW) NO.1413/2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.698/2023 (D)

¶6

Smt. Chandrakala wd/o Sahebrao Dhone and others

¶7

...Versus…

¶8

Smt. Sunanda w/o Bhujangrao Mohod and another

¶9

¶10

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders

¶11

- - - - ----- ------------ - Mr. R.G. Kavimandan, Advocate for applicants/petitioners Mrs. Naina Dhoke, Advocate h/f Mr. M.V. Rai, Advocate for respondents

¶12

CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 09/08/2024

¶13

The application seeks modification of the order dated 12/12/2023, by which the stay against the decree for eviction and possession, dated 29/04/2021 was granted by this Court, subject to the condition of deposit of Rs.2,00,000/- per year with the learned Appellate Court during the pendency of the appeal.

¶14

Mr. Kavimandan, learned counsel for the applicants, submits that the special leave petition filed against the order dated 12/12/2023 has been dismissed. He submits that on account of the medical emergency in the family of the applicants the condition has become onerous and is required to be relaxed.

¶15

CAW 1413 of 2024.odt

¶16

¶17

It is not in dispute that the condition was imposed for the purpose of enabling the applicants to continue in occupation of the premises in question, in respect of which, a decree of eviction has been passed by the learned Trial Court on 29/04/2021 and therefore, is a condition for stay of the eviction. It is an admitted position that the applicants, continue with the occupation of the premises in question even today on account of which, the landlord has been deprived of the benefit and use of the same, in spite of having a decree in his favour. The condition imposed, in practicality amounts to a sum of Rs.16,666/- per month, which cannot be said to be an onerous sum considering that the land is agricultural and is being utilized by the applicants for agricultural cultivation even today.

¶18

I, therefore, do not see any reason made out to relax the condition, as the applicants continue to make use of the agricultural land by cultivating it.

¶19

The civil application is rejected. No order as to

¶20

costs.

¶21

(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)

¶22

Wadkar

Smt. Chandrakala Wd/O Sahebrao Dhone and Others v. Smt. Sunanda W/O Bhujangrao Mohod and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Chandrakala Wd/O Sahebrao Dhone and Others v. Smt. Sunanda W/O Bhujangrao Mohod and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sant Saibaba Shikshan Sanstha, Wanadongri, Hingna, Nagpur Thr. Secretary and Others vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and Another

Mukteshwar Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahakari Society Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra through Minister and Ors.

M/S. Poonam Resorts Ltd. Nagpur Thr. Directors, Nandkumar Harchandani and Orschauh Vs R. K. Mishra, Indian Bank, Zonal Manager, Asansol Zone, West Bengal

Nagthana Fisheries Co-Operative Society Ltd., Warud Thr. Its President, Arun Gulabrao Pohane Vs State of Maha. Thr. Commissioner of Fisheries Cum Asst. Registrar Co-Op. Socities, Mumbai and Ors.

Kishor S/O Uttamrao Gajbhiye Vs the Election Commission of India, through Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi and Others

Pratap Fatumal Dharra vs the State Ofmaharashtra Thr Its Principal Secretary and Ors.