Civil application in a writ petition seeking correction of an earlier order dated 12-3-2024. Counsel sought adjournment; the court corrected paragraph 5 to refer to impugned orders dated 16-2-2024 and 19-2-2024 and disposed of the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:4073-DB
1 CAW-1124-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Civil Application (CAW) No.1124 of 2024
In
Writ Petition No.1675 of 2024
[Ravindra Tukaramji Borkar VERSUS The Vice-Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya
Hindi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Wardha, through its Registrar, and others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's order
and Registrar's orders.
Shri P.S. Wathore, Counsel for Applicant/Petitioner.
Shri Kalyan Chiwarkar, Counsel, holding for Shri Anand Parchure, Counsel for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE AND ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : 10thAPRIL, 2024
1. Shri Kalyan Chiwarkar, Counsel, holding for Shri Anand Parchure, learned
counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that since Shri Anand Parchure
is not available, the matter be posted on 15-4-2024.
2. Having regard to the prayer made in the petition, we deem it appropriate to correct the order dated 12-3-2024 by replacing the words ‘impugned order’ occurring in Paragraph 5 by the words ‘impugned orders dated 16-2-2024 and 19-2-2024’. Necessary corrections be carried out accordingly.
3. The civil application stands disposed of.
(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
LANJEWAR
Ravindra Tukaramji Borkar
The Vice-Chancellor of Mahatma Gandhi Antarrashtriya Hindi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Wardha, through its Registrar
NITIN W. SAMBRE
ABHAY J. MANTRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court