Applications for condonation of delay in second appeals were dismissed for default after the applicant failed to appear on the listed date. Consequently, the second appeals and a pending application stood dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
29.963.13 cas.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 963 OF 2013 IN
SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 17551 OF 2013 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 977 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 978 OF 2013 IN
SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 17370 OF 2013
IRESH MASHAL
Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2024.08.29 09:21:09 +0530
Smt. Hirabai Jagannath Sasne, Through G.P.A. Mr. Ashok Jagannath Ashok Jagannath Sasne
.....Applicant
Vs.
Sau. Tilottama Bansidha Tinganre and ors .....Respondents
None for the appellant
Mr. Shrishail Sakhare for respondent no. 6 in SAST 17370/2013 Mr. Shubham Shinde i/b Mr. Suresl Shah, Senior Advocate for respondent no. 6 in SAST 17551/2013
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 26th AUGUST 2024
ORDER:
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 963 OF 2013 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
977 OF 2013:
1/2
29.963.13 cas.docx
second appeal.
also stand dismissed.
pending Civil Application No. 978 of 2013 is dismissed as infructuous.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Iresh Mashal
Sau. Tilottama Bansidha Tinganre and ors
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
