Single-judge order disposing of a civil application seeking a stay on the judgment and decree of the Appellate Court. The interim relief was granted because the second appeal was admitted, after which the application was disposed of.
Interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (a); application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
905 CAS 946-17.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 946 OF 2017 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 519 OF 2017
Madhukar Laxman Asabe ...Appellant. Versus Dattatray Bharat Aasabe ...Respondent.
Ms. S. S. Kanetkar and Mr. Yash Dewal for the Appellant. Mr. Saakshat Redekar and Mr. Surel S. Shah for the Respondent.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : April 4, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Civil application has been preferred seeking stay of the judgment and decree of the Appellate Court dated 22nd March 2017. The suit property is the sole property of which the partition was sought. Considering that the second appeal has been admitted, there shall be interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Civil application stands disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
1 of 1
Patil-SR
Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 05/04/2024 18:15:07
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madhukar Laxman Asabe
Dattatray Bharat Aasabe
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court