Application in a pending second appeal sought addition of the subsequent purchasers of the suit property as respondents. The court, after perusing the sale deed and plaint filed on record, allowed the application as prayed and directed the amendment be carried out forthwith.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 19sa491.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION [CAS] NO.940 OF 2024 IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.491 OF 2018
[Nandatai w/o Shankarrao Bhowate .vs. Munindrakumar Namdeorao Vaidya and others]
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders
Mr. P.A. Gode, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. A.N. Vastani, Advocate for L.Rs. of respondent no.3.
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 21st OCTOBER, 2024.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
Gulande
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the subsequent purchaser of the suit property should be added as a party respondent to the pending second appeal.
Nandatai w/o Shankarrao Bhowate
Munindrakumar Namdeorao Vaidya
L.Rs. of respondent no.3
Sanjay A. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
