Disposed

Smt.Leela Vishwanath Oundhe v. Mr.Bhaskar Murgyappa Kaulapure (Deceased Thru Lrs) Smt.Kamal Bhaskar Kaulapure

Bombay HC12 Apr 2024CAS/72/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interlocutory order in a second appeal concerning property/title dispute between family members. Two civil applications (No.71 and No.72 of 2018) for amendment were heard and allowed in terms of their respective prayer clauses. The appeal was listed for final hearing from 10 June 2024, with interim relief continuing.

What the court decided

AI extract

Smt.Leela Vishwanath Oundhe Vs Mr.Bhaskar Murgyappa Kaulapure (Deceased Thru Lrs) Smt.Kamal Bhaskar Kaulapure — Bombay HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SMITA Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVESDate: 2024.04.12 GONSALVES 18:39:28 +0530

¶2

24.sa748-04.doc

¶3

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶5

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

SECOND APPEAL NO.748 OF 2004

¶7

Bhaskar Murgyappa Kaulapure, since deceased, through L.R. Smt. Kamal Bhaskar Kaulapure, since deceased, through her legal Representatives ....Appellants/Applicants vs.

¶8

Ashok @ Virupaksha Murgyappa Kaulapure And Ors.

¶9

...Respondents

¶10

WITH

¶11

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.812 OF 2004

¶12

¶13

SECOND APPEAL NO.748 OF 2004 WITH

¶14

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.71 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.748 OF 2004 WITH

¶15

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.72 OF 2018 IN

¶16

SECOND APPEAL NO.748 OF 2004

¶17

Mr Sanjay D. Thokade, for the Appellant in SA and Applicant in CAS/71/2018.

¶18

Mr Ajay Raje Nimbalkar, i/b. S.S. Patwardhan, for Respondent No.1.

¶19

Mr Ketan Joshi, for Respondent No.2 in SA and Applicant in CAS/72/2018.

¶20

Mr Akshay Kulkarni, i/b. A.M. Kulkarni, for the proposed Respondent Nos. 4 to 7.

¶21

 1 / 3

¶22

24.sa748-04.doc

¶23

¶24

Coram : R.N. Laddha, J.

¶25

Date : 12 April 2024

¶26

P.C. :

¶27

Civil Application No.71 of 2018

¶28

. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶29

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Necessary amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today.

¶30

3. Civil application disposed of.

¶31

Civil Application No.72 of 2018

¶32

4. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

¶33

For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

¶34

6. Civil application disposed of.

¶35

 2 / 3

¶36

24.sa748-04.doc

¶37

¶38

List this second appeal on final hearing board in the week commencing from 10 June 2024 . Interim relief granted earlier, if any, shall continue to operate till the next date.

¶39

(R.N. LADDHA, J.)

¶40

 3 / 3

Smt.Leela Vishwanath Oundhe v. Mr.Bhaskar Murgyappa Kaulapure (Deceased Thru Lrs) Smt.Kamal Bhaskar Kaulapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Smt.Leela Vishwanath Oundhe v. Mr.Bhaskar Murgyappa Kaulapure (Deceased Thru Lrs) Smt.Kamal Bhaskar Kaulapure

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Mukesh Vagatlal Siyal Vs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another

Mr. Firoz Buddu Khan Vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Another

Smt. Urmila W/O. Rameshchandra Chall Vs Akruli Satya Co-Op. Housing Society Limited

Vikram @ Pappu Rupchand Tasambad vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Ketan F. Karani and Anr. Vs M/S Orbit Impex and Anr.

Bhavin Chhotalal Sheth Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.