Civil application to set aside a conditional order of the Registrar dismissing an application for condonation of delay for non-removal of office objections. The court condoned the delay and allowed the application, subject to removal of all office objections within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
45.1307.18 cas.docx
Iresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1307 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 573 OF 2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 572 OF 2018 IN SECOND APPEAL ST NO. 21776 OF 2017
IRESH MASHAL
Mr. Aabaji Raghunath Gowade .....Applicant
Vs.
Digitally signed by IRESH MASHAL Date: 2024.09.11 13:01:30 +0530
Mr. Jagnnath Vinayak Kudtarkar .....Respondent
Mr. R. N. Kachave for the applicant
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 9th SEPTEMBER 2024
ORDER:
by the learned Registrar (Judicial-II) granting time to remove office objections.
applicant was unable to remove office objections within time, the conditional order operated and the application for condonation of delay
1/2
45.1307.18 cas.docx
stood dismissed. He submits that the reasons for not removing office objections within time and the delay in filing the application are explained in the application. He further submits that all the office objections shall be removed within four weeks from today. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondents were not represented in the application for condonation of delay when the conditional order was passed.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the application and the dismissal due to non-removal of office objections could be condoned.
Aabaji Raghunath Gowade
Jagnnath Vinayak Kudtarkar
Gauri Godse
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
