The court held that since a similar request was already considered in a related interim application leading to the Second Appeal being set for final hearing, the pending civil application does not require separate consideration and was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AS:13564
5cas487-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.487 OF 2019
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO. 251 OF 2011
Dinkar Shankar Powar ... Applicant. Versus Shamrao Shnakr Powar and Ors. ... Respondents.
Mr. V.B. Rajure, for the Applicant. Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar, for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5.
—————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J. Date : March 19, 2024.
P. C. :
1. Similar request was considered by this Court in Interim Application (St.) No.28908 of 2023 and the Second Appeal was directed to come up for final hearing as per its own turn. Hence, Civil Application does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
[Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.]
Signed by: Sanjay A. Mandawgad Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/03/2024 20:22:32
sa_mandawgad
1 of 1
Dinkar Shankar Powar
Shamrao Shnakr Powar
Sharmila U. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
