Civil applications arising in a second appeal after the death of respondent Leelabai; her advocate disclosed legal representatives. The court issued notice to remaining legal representatives, permitted service by RPAD/Speed Post, and adjourned for two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
sa15,02.odt 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) No.399 OF 2024 AND CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) No.398 OF 2024
I N
SECOND APPEAL No.15 OF 2002
(Shri Pilaram s/o. Sitaramji Amle Vs. Smt. Leelabai w/o. Manohar Khandait)
Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram,__________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders.
and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. J.R. Kidilay, Advocate for appellant.
Ms. Ayushi Dangre, Advocate for respondent.
C ORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. D ATE : 12th JULY, 2024.
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
Wadode
Signed by: Mr. Devendra Wadode Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 12/07/2024 20:48:16
Shri Pilaram s/o. Sitaramji Amle
Smt. Leelabai w/o. Manohar Khandait
Sanjay A. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
