Allowed

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar v. Nandlal Hemandas Sahairamani

Bombay HC22 Apr 2024CAS/371/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, allowed an application to condone a delay of 1430 days in bringing legal representatives of a deceased appellant on record. The court set aside the abatement and allowed the applications to continue the interim stay.

What did the court decide?

Delay of 1430 days in filing application for bringing legal representatives on record is condoned; abatement set aside.

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar Vs Nandlal Hemandas… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

1-CAS-370-2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 370 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2009

¶5

(Anandrao Natthuji Tarankar Vs. Nandlal Hemandas Sahajramani)

¶6

(Applicant – Smt. Suman wd/o Anandrao Tarankar)

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's Orders.

¶8

Court's or Judge's orders.

¶9

Shri S.K. Chaware, Counsel for the LRs of the applicant/
appellant.
Shri G.I. Dipwani, Counsel for the non-applicant/respondent.

¶10

CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE, J.

¶11

 APRIL 22, 2024.

¶12

By present application, one of the legal
representatives, namely, Smt. Suman, is seeking to
condone delay in filing application for bringing on record
the legal representatives of the appellant.

¶13

2]The learned Counsel for the applicant
submits that the appellant, late Anandrao, never disclosed
about pendency of Court cases to any of his family
members to which the learned Counsel for the non-
applicant has invited my attention to the written
statement filed by the appellant before the trial Court,
wherein the appellant has averred that the
respondent/non-applicant pressurized him (appellant) to
ask his son to withdraw the proceedings initiated by him
(son) against the respondent/non-applicant. The learned
Counsel for the non-applicant accordingly contends that
the son was aware of pendency of cases.

¶14

¶15

1-CAS-370-2023

¶16

3]To my mind, to jump to such a conclusion is
something which is beyond what has been stated in the
written statement. The appellant has averred about the
proceedings initiated by his son against the respondent/
non-applicant. He has not stated anything about
pendency of present case.

¶17

4]In view of above and for the reasons set out
in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 1430
days in filing application for setting aside abatement and
bringing legal representatives of the deceased appellant
on record, is condoned.

¶18

5]The Civil Application is disposed of.

¶19

CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 369/2023 AND 371/2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 404/2009

¶20

6]By present applications, the legal
representatives of the appellant are seeking to set aside
abatement of appeal and to permit them to pursue the
appeal.

¶21

7]For the reasons set out in the applications,
the same are allowed as prayed for. The applicant shall
carry out necessary amendment in the cause title and
serve amended copy upon the respondent/non-applicant.

¶22

8]The Civil Applications are disposed of.

¶23

SECOND APPEAL NO. 404 OF 2009

¶24

9]Considering the substantial questions of law,
as formulated, it will be not only appropriate but

¶25

¶26

1-CAS-370-2023

¶27

necessary to continue the interim stay granted by this
Court vide order dated 16/10/2009. Order accordingly.

¶28

10]List after vacation.

¶29

 (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.)

¶30

Sumit

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar v. Nandlal Hemandas Sahairamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar v. Nandlal Hemandas Sahairamani

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harilal S/O Dago Raut (Dead) through Lrs. Manojkumar S/O Harilal Raut and Others Vs Yashodabai W/O Chiman Darwade and 2 Others

Mukesh S/O Pundalik Tekade Vs Sau. Pratibha W/O Mukesh Tekade and Others

J.P. Brahme (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. K.J. Brahme (Deceased) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Kalpana K. Bramhe and Others Vs Omkar S/O Shivkumar Parihar and Another

Wasidep @ Chandrashekhar S/O Krushnarao Lende Vs Sau. Leela @ Madhuri Prabhakarrao Jengthe and Others

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar Vs Nandlal Hemandas Sahairamani

Anandrao Nathuji Tarankar Vs Nandlal Hemandas Sahairamani