Tata Motors Finance Limited v. Priyanka Services
Case brief
What is this about?
Commercial arbitration petition adjourned due to paucity of time; interim relief, if any, granted earlier continued until the next date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Board Sr.No.:-0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 446 OF 2024
Tata Motors Finance Limited ....PETITIONER V/S Priyanka Services ....RESPONDENT
CORAM : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FIRDOSH PHIROZE POONIWALLA J DATE : 4th December, 2024
P.C. :
Balance Daily Board cannot be taken up today on account of paucity of time. Stand over to 05/02/2025 . Ad-interim relief or interim relief, if any, granted earlier will continue to operate till next date.
( ASSOCIATE )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tata Motors Finance Limited
- respondent
Priyanka Services
Coram
Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court