Civil application for speaking to minutes in a first appeal; the court found the applicant's prayer itself was incorrect, directed the applicants to file an appropriate application, and disposed of the civil application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:1904
903.ca.246.24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.246 OF 2024 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1067 OF 2013
(V.I.D.C. Vs. Pandharinath Shamrao Ajmire (dead) thr.L.R’s and ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order
Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order
Ms M. Babhulkar, Advocate h/f Mr. Amol Patil, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. M.H. Deshmukh, AGP for the State. Mr. A.B. Nakshane, Advocate for respondent No.1.
CORAM:- URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED :- FEBRUARY 9, 2024
The application is for speaking to minutes.
(URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.)
*Divya
V.I.D.C.
Pandharinath Shamrao Ajmire (dead) thr. L.R.s
Urmila Joshi-Phalke
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
