Allowed

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe. Engineer Wan Project Div. Shegaon Dist Buldhana v. Sahebrao Jagdev Vakode and Others

Bombay HC24 Oct 2024CAF/1969/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed the civil application to condone a delay of 76 days in filing an appeal. Furthermore, it allowed an application regarding the withdrawal of a deposited award amount, directing the registry to pay 50% on undertaking and 25% on solvent surety.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 76 days delay; Registry to pay 50% on undertaking and 25% on solvent surety with interest.

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe. Engineer Wan… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

1 24caf1969.24.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION [CAF] NO.1969 OF 2024 IN

¶4

FIRST APPEAL ST. NO.11139 OF 2024

¶5

[Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal .vs. Sahebrao Jagdev Vakode and others]

¶6

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions

¶8

and Registrar's orders

¶9

¶10

Mr. M.A. Kadu, Advocate for Applicant.

¶11

Mr. Chaitanya Kulkarni, Advocate holding for Mr. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶12

Mr. P.P. Pendke, AGP for Respondent Nos.3 and 4.

¶13

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 24th OCTOBER, 2024.

¶14

This is an application for condonation of delay of 76 days caused for filing of the appeal. Perused the application.

¶15

Heard the learned advocate for both the sides.

¶16

Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed as the delay is not deliberately caused.

¶17

The application is allowed in the interest of justice.

¶18

The delay of 76 days is condoned.

¶19

The application is disposed.

¶20

Civil Application (F) No.3170/2024

¶21

This is an application filed by applicants-respondent nos.1 and 2 for withdrawal of an amount deposited in this court by the appellant as per the award passed by the authority under the Land Acquisition Act. Perused the application.

¶22

Heard the learned advocates for both the sides.

¶23

2 24caf1969.24.odt

¶24

Considering the reasons stated in the application, the application deserves to be allowed. The application is allowed in the interest of justice.

¶25

Registry is directed to pay 50% amount on usual undertaking and 25% amount on execution of solvent surety along with accrued interest thereon to the applicantsrespondent nos.1 and 2.

¶26

The application is disposed.

¶27

First Appeal St. No.11139/2024

¶28

Heard. 2. Admit. 3. Issue notice to the respondents. 4. Learned advocate waives notice for respondent nos.1 and 2. 5. Learned AGP waives notice for respondent nos.3 and 4. 6. Call for record and proceedings.

¶29

(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)

¶30

Gulande

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe. Engineer Wan Project Div. Shegaon Dist Buldhana v. Sahebrao Jagdev Vakode and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe. Engineer Wan Project Div. Shegaon Dist Buldhana v. Sahebrao Jagdev Vakode and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe Enginner Wan Project Div Shegaon Dist Buldhana Vs Ajabrao Manikrao Sabe and Others

Vidarbha Patbandhare Vikas Mahamandal Thr Exe Enginner Wan Project Div Shegaon Dist Buldhana Vs Devidas Namdev Sabe (Died) Thr Lrs Saramdhar Namdev Sabe and Others

Tukaram Jagoba Thakre Vs Sumitra Deoraji Kale and Others

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Project, Wardha vs Shri Dashrath S/O Rambhau Deshmukh and Others

The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Project, Wardha vs Shri Dashrath S/O Rambhau Deshmukh and Others

Shahin Firdos Talimullahkha vs the State of Maharashtra, through Honble Collector, Amravati and Others