Appellant sought permission to withdraw remaining 50% amount deposited in court under an award. Court partly allowed, permitting respondent No.1 to withdraw 25% of the remaining deposited amount with accrued interest on furnishing usual undertaking.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-NAG:7312
1 5-FA No.1022.2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
CIVIL APPLICATION (CAF) NO. 189 OF 2024 IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1022 OF 2017
Executive Engineer (V.I.D.C.), Minor Irrigation Division, Washim
..VS..
Rupchand S/o Rajaram Bang and another
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mrs. U.A. Patil, Advocate for appellant. Mr. Amol Darekar, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. P.P. Pendke, AGP for respondent No.2.
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 10th JULY, 2024
(SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.)
Kirtak
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the claimant should be permitted to withdraw part of the remaining deposited amount with interest.
Executive Engineer (V.I.D.C.), Minor Irrigation Division, Washim
Rupchand S/o Rajaram Bang
Respondent No.2
Sanjay A. Deshmukh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
