This order addresses the delay in filing Civil Application No. 1337 of 2016. The court held that the delay of two years and three days was condonable. Consequently, the application was allowed and disposed of with a direction to register the appeal.
The application is allowed and disposed of; appeal to be registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23-CAF-1337-2016.doc
S.S.Kilaje
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1337 OF 2016 IN
FIRST APPEAL STAMP NO. 14542 OF 2015
Savita Prasad Dandekar and Anr. … Applicants
Versus
Baban Gulab Tawade and Ors. ...Respondents
Mr. V. B. Ghorpade, Advocate for the Applicants.
Ms. Jyoti Bajapayee, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for Respondent No.2.
2.Considering the submissions of both learned counsel and reasons
mentioned in the application, delay of 2 years and 3 days for filing the
appeal is condoned. The application is allowed and disposed of.
3. The appeal be registered.
4. Applicants are not entitled for interest for delayed period if he succeeds in the interim application.
SONALISATISHKILAJE Digitallysigned bySONALISATISHKILAJEDate:2024.01.1718:12:16+0530
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a delay of two years and three days in filing the appeal warrants condonation.
Savita Prasad Dandekar
Baban Gulab Tawade
Shivkumar Dige
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court