The court allowed leave to withdraw an appeal and dismissed it as infructuous with consequential disposal of pending applications, as the underlying suit was disposed of.
Leave to withdraw appeal granted; appeal dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by CHITRA CHITRA SANJAY SANJAY SONAWANE SONAWANE Date: 2024.02.23 19:09:39 Chitra Sonawane 1 +0530 501-AO-400-2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Appeal from Order No.400 of 2018
a/w
Civil Application No.525 of 2018
Palani Mahalingam Pallar … Appellant.
Vs.
MCGM… Respondent.
a/w
Civil Application No.526 of 2018
in
Appeal from Order No.400 of 2018
Juhu Vile Parle Development CHS Ltd... Applicant.
Vs.
Palani Mahalingam Pallar... Respondent.
Ms Aishwarya Shinde i/by Ketki Gadkari for appellant.
Ms Smita V. Tondwalkar for respondent/MCGM.
Coram: R. N. Laddha, J.
Date : 23 February 2024.
P.C. :-
LearnedCounsel for the appellant seeks leave to
withdraw this appeal since the suit itself has been disposed of.
Leave as prayed for is granted. The appeal is dismissed as
Chitra Sonawane 2 501-AO-400-2018.doc
infructuous. As a sequel, pending applications also stand
disposed of.
[R. N. Laddha, J. ]
Palani Mahalingam Pallar
MCGM
Juhu Vile Parle Development CHS Ltd
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court