Dependents of a deceased person sought withdrawal of deposited compensation in a pending first appeal against MSRTC. Court allowed withdrawal of 80% with proportionate interest, condoned delay in filing the appeal, and stayed execution of the award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
908-CA.4477-24.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4477 OF 2024 IN FAST/1785/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 973 OF 2024 IN FAST/1785/2024 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 974 OF 2024
IN FAST/1785/2024
TULSABAI W/O SHRIRAM CHATE AND ANR VERSUS
THE MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THROUGH THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER AND ANR
Advocate for Applicant in CA/4477/24 : Mr. Raut A. D. Advocate for Applicants in CA/973-974/24 : Mr. S. B. Solanke h/f A. D. Wange.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mrs. M. L. Sangit.
CORAM : S. G. MEHARE, J. DATE : 08.05.2024
PER COURT :-
908-CA.4477-24.odt
2
Hence, the following order :
O R D E R
Civil Application No. 974 of 2024 (Stay)
908-CA.4477-24.odt
3
Civil Application No. 973 of 2024 (Delay)
application is allowed. Delay stands condoned.
vmk/-
1 issue framed by the court
Should the dependents be permitted to withdraw a portion of the deposited award amount pending appeal?
Tulsabai w/o Shriram Chate
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation through the Divisional Controller
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
