Writ petition against the State of Maharashtra was withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions. A civil application by an individual seeking to be added as petitioner was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:19654-DB
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
911 WRIT PETITION NO. 1683 OF 2022 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9207 OF 2024
MAHANANDA DEVNATH DAHIPHALE AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. S.B. Sontakke AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 3 : Mr. V.M. Jaware Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. U. B. Bondar
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL &
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 28 AUGUST 2024
PER COURT :
Learned Advocate Mr. Sontakke for the petitioners, on
instructions seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
withdrawn.
seeking to be included in the array of the petitioners is disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ]
Thakur-Chauhan/-
Mahananda Devnath Dahiphale and others
The State of Maharashtra
Mangesh S. Patil
Shailesh P. Brahme
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
