The High Court allowed the application for condonation of a 2290-day delay in filing an appeal assailing a Revenue Award, finding sufficient reasons to permit condonation.
Application allowed; appeal registered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca8871.22.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
973 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8871 OF 2022 IN FAST/7414/2022
The Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Tuljapur ….Applicant VERSUS Balkrashna s/o Vankatrao Kadam & others …..Respondents
Mr. K. K. Kulkarni, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. V.S. Badakh, AGP for the State. Mr. P. B. Rakhunde, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE :14th AUGUST, 2024.
PER COURT :
caused in filing appeal assailing award dated 31.08.2015 passed by the Reference Court in LAR No. 23/2013.
ca8871.22.odt
objection contending that no sufficient case is made out to condone the delay.
( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR) Judge
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 2290 days in filing the appeal warrants condonation.
Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Tuljapur
Balkrashna s/o Vankatrao Kadam
S. G. Chapalgankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
