The Bombay High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a civil application (review) admitting to being withdrawn by the learned advocate on instructions from the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:17142-DB
1 901ca6762o24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6762 OF 2024 IN WP/6131/2023
PAIKRAO PRADNYA MADHUKAR VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
Shri Shrimant Mundhe, Advocate for the Applicant. Shri V.M. Kagne, AGP for Respondent No.1/State. Shri A.B. Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent No.2. Shri Mukul Kulkarni, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & R.M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE :- 01st August, 2024
Per Court :-
the Nagpur Bench in Writ Petition No.3569/2023 ( Prashant
Uttam Tapare and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and
others ) and two connected matters, which is an interim order, is
cited as the solitary ground for seeking review of our final order.
passed on 19.03.2024 in Writ Petition No.6143/2023 ( Gopal
2 901ca6762o24
Motilal Sharma vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) and other connected petitions. This order has not been cited before the Nagpur Bench, which passed it’s interim order on 01.07.2024. Similarly, the order dated 05.07.2024, passed by this Court at the Principal Seat in Writ Petition No.6911/2023 ( Neha Ravishankar Dave vs. The State of Maharashtra and others ) and other connected petitions, is an interim order, which was passed on the basis of the interim order passed at the Nagpur Bench. Even before the Principal Seat, the final order dated 19.03.2024, passed by us, was not cited.
Paikrao Pradnya Madhukar
The State of Maharashtra
Ravindra V. Ghuge
R.M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
