Application filed to condone 2190 days delay in filing review of a 2018 order. Court found no merit due to huge unexplained delay and rejected the application.
Application for condonation of delay and review petition sought is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:25384-DB
ca-5664.24
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1087 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5664 OF 2024
IN RAST/13852/2024
NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR IS COMMISSIONER VERSUS
GANGABAI NARSHING MUDIRAJ AND ORS
WITH
CONT. PETITION NO. 462 OF 2022 IN WP/11608/2021
... Mr. R.K. Ingole Advocate for Applicant. Mr. A.A. Mukhedkar Advocate for Resp. Nos. 1 and 2 . Mr. V.K. Kotecha, A.G.P. for Resp. Nos. 3 to 6.
CORAM: SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JJ.
DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2024
ORDER :
ca-5664.24
2
3. Perusal of the application shows that the contempt petition
was filed and then it was realized by the applicant that review needs to be filed. The applicant seeks review of order passed by this Court on 11th April 2018 in Writ Petition No. 2993 of 2017. We do not find any merit in the application. There is huge and inordinate delay, which has not been explained properly and therefore, the Application stands rejected.
[S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR] [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] JUDGE JUDGE
asb/OCT24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay for filing review application is justified given the inordinate lapse of time without proper explanation.
Nanded Waghalacity Municipal Corporation through its Commissioner
Gangabai Narshing Mudiraj
Others
Vibha Kankanwadi
S. G. Chapalgaonkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
