Disposed

Kondiba Maruti Magar Died Thr Lrs Balasaheb Kondiba Magar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.

Bombay HC11 Jan 2024CA/474/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicants sought modification of earlier orders requiring a bank guarantee before withdrawing 50% of compensation deposited in the court, stating they could not furnish one. The court allowed substitution of solvent surety/security and permitted withdrawal with accrued interest.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kondiba Maruti Magar Died Thr Lrs Balasaheb Kondiba Magar Vs… — Land Acquisition | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 474 OF 2024 IN FA/3635/2016

¶3

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 475 OF 2024 IN FA/3635/2016 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 436 OF 2024 IN FA/2287/2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 439 OF 2024 IN FA/2288/2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 437 OF 2024 IN FA/2291/2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 438 OF 2024 IN FA/2289/2015

¶4

KONDIBA MARUTI MAGAR DIED THR LRS BALASAHEB KONDIBA MAGAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COLLECTOR, OSMANABAD AND ORS

¶5

Mr. L. C. Patil, Advocate for the applicant Mr. D. B. Bhanage, AGP for the respondent/State Mr. R. A. Tambe, Advocate for respondent No.3.

¶6

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 11^th JANUARY, 2024

¶7

P.C. :-

¶8

Civil Application No. 474 of 2024 shows that the LR’s of deceased Kondiba Maruti Magar are already on record. Hence, applicant is permitted to delete his name from title clause. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.

¶9

Other Civil Applications are moved seeking modification in the orders dated 12/10/2017 and 08/12/2017. This Court was pleased to allow the applicant-original claimant to withdraw the entire amount

¶10

1 of 3

¶11

913.ca474.24.odt

¶12

deposited in this Court by the appellant-acquiring body. While allowing the application 50% amount was directed to be withdrawn on furnishing undertaking that in the event if adverse order is passed, then the amount of compensation would be refunded/re-deposited in this Court within two (02) months from the date of order. Remaining amount fo 50% was directed to be withdrawn on furnishing bank guarantee. The applicants pursuant to the order passed by this Court withdrew the amount of 50% on furnishing undertaking.

¶13

The applicant has now filed this application seeking relaxation of condition of furnishing bank guarantee. A difficulty is therefore expressed that the applicant is not in a position to furnish bank guarantee. A relaxation is therefore prayed for. Now, the applicant prayed that instead of bank guarantee he may be permitted to furnish solvent surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court and to that extent he is seeking modification in the orders dated 12/10/2017 and 08/12/2017. This Court has already passed similar order in Civil Application No. 12293/2023.

¶14

In view of the same, these applications also stand allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). The Registrar (Judicial) of this Court to accept the solvent surety/security to his satisfaction. The Registrar (Judicial) to

¶15

2 of 3

¶16

913.ca474.24.odt

¶17

allow the applicants to withdraw remaining 50% amount on furnishing solvent surety/security. The Registrar (Judicial) to accept the solvent surety/security in place of bank guarantee. The orders dated 12/10/2017 and 08/12/2017 is modified to that extent. The amount deposited in this Court be permitted to be withdrawn by the applicant along with accrued interest.

¶18

In view of above, the civil applications stands disposed of.

¶19

(R. M. JOSHI, J.)

¶20

ssp

¶21

3 of 3

¶22

913.ca474.24.odt

Kondiba Maruti Magar Died Thr Lrs Balasaheb Kondiba Magar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Kondiba Maruti Magar Died Thr Lrs Balasaheb Kondiba Magar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Executive Engineer Kukadi Canal Construction Division, Kolwadi Division Vs Chandrakala Dinkar Borade and Another

Vyankat Rangrao Kohale (Died) Thr Lrs Ramesh Vyankatrao Kohale and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Collector Latur and Anr.

Suryakant Vithhal Ghadge Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Suresh Yashwant Chavan Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.

Panchphula Rangnath Mane Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.

Narayan Rangnath Mane Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Collector, Osmanabad and Ors.