The High Court Bench allowed a Civil Application to the extent of condoning a 23-day delay in filing, finding the delay was not deliberate or intentional, and directed registration of a Review Application.
Civil Application allowed for condonation of 23 days delay; Review Application registration directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:14529-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4665 OF 2024 IN RAST/12021/2024
M.S.E.T. THR ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR VERSUS
AMOL GOVINDSING MAHER AND OTHERS
Mr. S. V. Adwant, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. M. M. Nerlikar, AGP for Respondent/State
Ms. Nikita Gore h/f Mr. S. R. Sapkal, Advocate for the Petitioner in W.P. No. 12906/2023
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND R. M. JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : 12th JULY, 2024
PER COURT :-
after issuance of notice. The non-Applicants opposed the Application for condonation of delay of 23 days.
1 of 2
906.ca4665.24.odt
( R. M. JOSHI, J. )
ssp
2 of 2
906.ca4665.24.odt
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 23 days in filing the civil application deserves condonation.
M.S.E.T. THR ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
R. M. JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
