Anandrao Govindrao Pawar v. State of Mharashtra and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition rendered infructuous due to orders in connected special leave petition. Disposed of as infructuous with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
208-wp2460-1998.doc
VRJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Digitally signed byVAIBHAV RAMESHJADHAVDate: 2024.04.0610:02:58 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO.2460 OF 1998
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4182 OF 2000
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2460 OF 1998 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.6983 OF 1998 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2460 OF 1998
Anandrao Govindrao Pawar … Petitioner V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. Y. D. Patil, AGP for the State/respondent Nos.1, 5 and 6.
Mr. Samir Suryawanshi and Ms. Bhakti Wast for the respondent No.8.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J. DATED : APRIL 5, 2024
P.C.:
1
208-wp2460-1998.doc
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
2
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.12561 of 2000Referred¶17
Anandrao Govindrao Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
Amit Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court