This court disposed of Civil Application No. 1800 of 2018 filed by the first and second respondents seeking to add additional parties, holding the application to be infructuous. The second appeal was listed for a final hearing on 15th February, 2024.
Civil Application No. 1800 of 2018 stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
941 SA-443-2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
941 SECOND APPEAL NO. 443 OF 2004
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1800 OF 2018 IN SA/443/2004
SUSHILABAI MAHADEO SHINDE
VERSUS
JAHEDABEE MAHEMOOD SHAIKH AND OTHERS
Mr. B.L. Sagar Killarikar – Advocate for Appellant
Mr. G.L. Deshpande and Mr. G.K. Naik (Thigale) – Advocates
for Respondent Nos.1 and 2
Mr. M.L. Dharashive – Advocate for Respondent No.3
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 16th January, 2024
PER COURT:
1. Learned Counsel Mr. G.K. Naik (Thigale) for respondent
Nos.1 and 2 in Second Appeal submits that, these
respondents have filed Civil Application No. 1800 of 2018 for
adding some respondents. However, he submits that, this
application is now infructuous and can be disposed of.
2. In view of the same, Civil Application No. 1800 of 2018 stands disposed of.
Pooja K.
1/2
941 SA-443-2004
3. List the Second Appeal on 15th February, 2024 at 2:30 p.m. by way of last chance.
[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ]JUDGEPooja K.
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the filed civil application for adding additional respondents is now infructuous and requires disposal?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SUSHILABAI MAHADEO SHINDE
JAHEDABEE MAHEMOOD SHAIKH
OTHERS
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court