C.A. filed for condonation of 40-day delay in preferring second appeal. Court found no malafides and allowed application in interest of justice. Adjacent subsection registers appeal and lists it for admission.
Application for condonation of delay allowed; appeal registered and stand over for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
- 1 -
ca15435.11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15435 OF 2011 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 30729 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra & others .. Applicants Versus Sudhir Sudhakar Jadhav & others .. Respondents
Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for the State. Mr. P. D. Bachate, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 3.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2024.
PER COURT :
ca15435.11.odt
clause ‘B’.
dyb
ca15435.11.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 30729 OF 2011
The State of Maharashtra & others .. Appellants Versus Sudhir Sudhakar Jadhav & others .. Respondents
Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for the State. Mr. P. D. Bachate, Advocate for respondents No. 1 & 3.
CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 23rd JANUARY, 2024.
PER COURT :
( R. M. JOSHI) Judge
dyb
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing second appeal should be condoned.
The State of Maharashtra & others
Sudhir Sudhakar Jadhav & others
R. M. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
