The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad disposed of an application seeking restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default. The court issued notices to respondents with waiver of service by the advocates. No substantive consideration of restoration was found in the text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca12933.24
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
915 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12933 OF 2024 IN WP/8460/2023
Mohammad Faisal Sheikh Rahim Bharti VERSUS
State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and others
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kishore Doke h/f Mr. Rahul A. Shinde AGP for Respondent Nos. 1, 5 and 7: Ms. S.S. Joshi Advocate for respondent Nos. 2: Mr.A.R. Nikam
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ. DATED : 04 DECEMBER 2024
PER COURT :-
This is an application seeking restoration of the writ petition, which has been dismissed in default with a prayer to condone the delay in seeking the restoration.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
(MANGESH S. PATIL, J.)
rlj/
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in seeking restoration of the writ petition can be condoned.
Whether the writ petition should be restored or dismissed.
Mohammad Faisal Sheikh Rahim Bharti
State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary and others
MANGESH S. PATIL
PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
