Single judge disposed of a civil application for early hearing, refusing it as pending old matters delay the docket and listing the matter chronologically instead.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:372
910 CA-11343-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
910 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11343 OF 2023
IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 740 OF 2014
SHEELA BHARAT KUTE
VERSUS
MUKTABAI BABASAHEB KUTE
Ms. Laxmi Thakur h/f. Mr. L.C. Patil – Advocate for Applicant
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.
DATE : 10th January, 2024
PER COURT:
1. The application for fixing early date of hearing. However,
so many old matters are already pending which are pertaining
to years 1992, 1994. As such, list this matter as per its
chronological turn.
2. The civil application accordingly disposed of.
[ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ]JUDGEPooja K.
1/1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the civil application should be fixed for early hearing or listed according to chronological order of pending.
What order should be passed with respect to the civil application.
SHEELA BHARAT KUTE
MUKTABAI BABASAHEB KUTE
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court