The High Court Bench at Aurangabad observed that the respondent did not file an appearance despite service of notice and directed issuance of a fresh notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
31 WRIT PETITION NO. 8364 OF 2024
Gulab Rambhau Kshirsagar And Others VERSUS
State Of Of Maharashtra Through The Collector And Others
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Latange Vijay Prabhakarrao AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. N. D. Raje
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11213 OF 2024 IN WP/8364/2024
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : October 14, 2024.
PER COURT :-
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. )
vj gawade/-.
Page 1 of 1
Gulab Rambhau Kshirsagar
State of Maharashtra
Arun R. Pedneker
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
