Disposed

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar v. Manik Bhimrao Koli ( Jamadar ) Lrs Surjabai and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Feb 2024CA/10821/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural orders in three civil applications for bringing legal representatives of deceased respondents on record in pending second appeals. Applications were allowed where served respondents did not oppose or were absent, one with delay of 3856 days condoned by implication; amendment directed within two weeks and notice issued to added respondents.

What did the court decide?

Applications allowed to bring legal heirs of deceased respondents on record; amendment within two weeks and notice to added respondents.

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar Vs Manik Bhimrao… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

ca10820.15.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶4

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10820 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5180 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 9208 OF 2007

¶5

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar .. Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

Manik Bhimrao Koli (Deceased through LRs) & others .. Respondents

¶8

Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate holding for Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the applicant.

¶9

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12^th FEBRUARY, 2024.

¶10

PER COURT :

¶11

None for respondents No. 9A and 9C inspite of service of notice. Application is already abated against respondents No. 9B and 9D. Absence of served respondents indicates that they have no inclination to oppose the application. Hence, application stands allowed to the extent of bringing respondents No. 9A and 9C on record. Amendment be carried out within two weeks.

¶12

Issue notice to added respondents returnable four weeks thereafter.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge

dyb

ca10820.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶18

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10812 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5180 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 9203 OF 2007

¶19

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar .. Applicant

¶20

Versus

¶21

Manik Bhimrao Koli (Deceased through LRs) & others .. Respondents

¶22

Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate holding for Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the applicant.

¶23

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12^th FEBRUARY, 2024.

¶24

PER COURT :

¶25

Issue notice to proposed respondents i.e. legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 1 returnable on 11^th March, 2024.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge

dyb

ca10820.15.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶31

CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10821 OF 2015 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5180 OF 2007 IN SECOND APPEAL ST. NO. 9208 OF 2007

¶32

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar .. Applicant

¶33

Versus

¶34

Manik Bhimrao Koli (Deceased through LRs) & others .. Respondents

¶35

Mr. H. B. Nandagavale, Advocate holding for Mr. V. G. Sakolkar, Advocate for the applicant.

¶36

CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATE : 12^th FEBRUARY, 2024.

¶37

PER COURT :

¶38

This application is for bringing on record legal heirs of deceased respondent No. 7 by condoning delay of 3856 days.

¶39

Though proposed respondent No. 7A is duly served he is absent which indicates that this respondent has no inclination to oppose the application.

¶40

In view of this, application is allowed. Amendment be carried out within two weeks.

¶41

Issue notice to added respondent returnable four weeks thereafter.

¶42

dyb

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar v. Manik Bhimrao Koli ( Jamadar ) Lrs Surjabai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrakant Baburao Wadikar v. Manik Bhimrao Koli ( Jamadar ) Lrs Surjabai and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Ashok Pradhan vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Devidas Haridas Balde Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Apparao Kishan Suryawanshi and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Ms. Delna Adi Mehta Aka Mrs. Delna Riyaz Shaikh. vs Padma Adi Mehta

Syed Musa Syed Begu Vs the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division NO.1, Aurangabad and Ors.

Kalpanabai Babanrao Patil and Ors. Vs the Reliance General Insurance Co. Thr Its Official, Nasik and Anr.