Allowed

Mohd. Azad Mohd Sharif Farooqui v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC15 Mar 2024BA/966/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to applicant accused of offences under Section 307 and 324 IPC. Application granted due to four years of incarceration without trial completion despite completed investigation. Bail subject to bond and police reporting.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed on furnishing P.R. bond of Rs.25,000/- with sureties; terms to reside at Jogeshwari and report to police.

Mohd. Azad Mohd Sharif Farooqui Vs State of… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

(12)BA-966-2024.doc

¶2

rajshree

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

BAIL APPLICATION NO.3530 OF 2023

¶6

Mohd. Azad Mohd. Sharif Farooqui ] .. Applicant vs. State of Maharashtra ] .. Respondent

¶7

Mr.Ashish Shukla a/w Suraj Dubey h/f Prachish Shukla i/b Prime Glob Legal LLP for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms.M.H. Mhatre, APP for the State.

¶9

PSI Khandagale, Vanrai Police Station present.

¶10

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE : 15^th March, 2024.

¶11

P.C.

¶12

Digitally signed by RAJSHREE RAJSHREE KISHOR KISHOR MORE MORE Date: 2024.03.16 11:52:16 +0530

¶13

1] The Applicant faces accusation under Section 307, 324 of the IPC on the complaint filed by one Sunita Sahani, alleging that she was assaulted by the Applicant as some quibble occurred between the couple, who was in live in relationship for some considerable length of time.

¶14

The statement of the complainant specifically contain that they were into love relationship, however, since she was aggrieved by his behaviour, she detached her ties with him and started residing with her friend in Goregaon. Despite she distancing herself, the Applicant is alleged to have forced her to maintain the relationship and for the last six months, they used to meet outside.

¶15

1/3

¶16

(12)BA-966-2024.doc

¶17

On the date of the incident, when she had been to Mira Road to meet her mother, she came across the accused and he forced her to sit in the rickshaw and stabbed her on her chest as well as other parts of the body causing bleeding injuries. She was taken to the Hospital by him and administered treatment.

¶18

2] Surprisingly, the charge- sheet did not include the statement of the rickshaw driver.

¶19

The MLC Report at the Cooper Hospital record three injuries near the neck and linear spine which are described to be homicidal in nature and as far as the injury to the thorax is concerned, it is stated to be endangering her life.

¶20

3] On completion of investigation, charge sheet is filed and down the line,since the arrest of the Applicant on 30.05.2021, there is no progress in the trial.

¶21

It is informed that till date even the charge has not been framed and the prosecution intend to examine 17 witnesses to establish the guilt of the Applicant.

¶22

4] Considering the long incarceration of the Applicant for last four years and without any certainty as to the completion of the trial, since the investigation is complete, I deem it appropriate to release the Applicant on bail, subject to the following terms and conditions:-

¶23

ORDER

¶24

i] Bail Application is allowed. ii] Applicant – Mohd. Azad Mohd. Sharif Farooqui shall be

¶25

2/3

¶26

(12)BA-966-2024.doc

¶27

released on bail in connection with C.R.No.161 of 2021 registered with Vanrai Police Station on furnishing P.R. bond to the extent of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties of the like amount.

¶28

iii] Upon release, the Applicant undertake to reside in Jogeshwari and on the first date of his appearance before the Investigating Officer at Vanrai Police Station, he shall furnish his address where he is likely to reside and also his contact number and shall continue to report to the Police station on first Saturday of every month between 3.00 p.m. to 5.00 p.m. for a period of one year and thereafter once in every trimester till conclusion of the trial.

¶29

iv] The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Officer and should not tamper with evidence.

¶30

v] The Applicant shall regularly attend trial, on every date, unless exempted.

¶31

vi] The observations made above are prima facie in nature and limited for the purpose of determination of the present Application and the learned Judge trying the Applicant for the offences, with which he is charged, shall not in any manner be influenced by the above order.

¶32

[BHARATI DANGRE, J]

¶33

3/3

Mohd. Azad Mohd Sharif Farooqui v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Azad Mohd Sharif Farooqui v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd. Vs Harshaben Vijaybhai Shah Proprietor

Kaizen Domestic Scheme and Anr. Vs Your Kids R Our Kids (India) Education Private Limited and 4 Ors.

Ashish Dnyandeo Mane vs Pune Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Commissioner and Ors.

Foxymorom Media Solutions Private Limited vs Workamp Spaces Private Limited

Manjula Bholanath Singh Vs the State of Maharashtra

Nkgsb Co-Op. Bank Ltd. vs . Om Enterprises