Disposed

Komal Nitin Gautam v. State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC9 May 2024BA/924/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application by Accused No.5 in a jeweller robbery case; court noted delay in trial, applicant's youth, no antecedents, no flight risk, and released him on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties, with conditions including not entering Pune district except for trial/IO reporting and fortnightly reporting to Amgaon

Komal Nitin Gautam Vs State of Maharashtra — Bail and Remand | Bombay HC (2024)

¶1

513 BA 924.24.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.924 OF 2024

¶4

Komal Nitin Gautam ...Applicant

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent

¶7

Mr. Bhushan Raut a/w Mr. Shantanu Malshikare, Advocates, for the Applicant.

¶8

Ms. S.S. Kaushik, APP, for Respondent- State. API, Nagnath G. Patil, Supa Police Station- present.

¶9

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 9th May 2024

¶10

P. C.

¶11

Heard Mr. Raut, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Ms.

¶12

Kaushik, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

¶13

This regular Bail Application is preferred under Section 439 of

¶14

the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The relevant details are as follows:

¶15

1. C.R. No.	123 of 2023
2. Date of registration of F.I.R.	1^stApril 2023
3. Name of Police Station	Vadgaon Nimbalkar, Pune Rural (presently-Supa Police Station)
4. Sections invoked	394, 397, 398, 342 34 ofI.P.C., 1860; 3 and 24 of ArmsAct, 1959.
5. Date of incident	31^stMarch 2023
6. Date of arrest	2^ndApril 2023
7. Date of filingCharge-sheet	July2023

Page No. 1/5

Dusane

513 BA 924.24.doc

As per the prosecution case, there are 5 Accused. These 5 Accused and others had hired two rooms bearing Nos.205 and 206 in the Royal Blue Hotel in Pune. The present Applicant is Accused No.5. These 5 Accused discussed their plan to commit a robbery. As per the prosecution case, Accused Nos.1 to 4 left the said rooms and committed the offence at Mahalaxmi Jewellers, Baramati and while committing the offence, two Accused managed to escape and fled while the other 2 Accused i.e. Accused No.1-Pavan Jagdish Vishwakarma and Accused No.2-Pradip Bhaiyyala Bisen were caught red-handed on the spot. During investigation, they stated that they were staying at the said Hotel and therefore the Police came to the said Hotel, where the Applicant was present.

¶20

It is the contention of Mr. Raut, learned Counsel for the Applicant that at the most, the Applicant’s role is that he had participated in the pre-planning. He submitted that as far as pre-planning is concerned, even the shop in which the robbery was to be committed was also not decided. The Applicant was not aware about any details and in fact Accused Nos.1 to 4 left the said Hotel without informing him. He submitted that the Applicant is a Computer Science Graduate and is 25 years old. He submitted that the Applicant has no antecedents. He therefore submitted that the Applicant be enlarged on bail.

Page No. 2/5

Dusane

513 BA 924.24.doc

On the other hand, Ms. Kaushik, learned APP vehemently opposed the Bail Application. She pointed out the statement of witnessGaurav Sanjay Uke (page-86) and the recovery panchanama (pages 57 to 59) and submitted that the Applicant has participated in the offence in question and therefore the Bail Application be rejected. However, after taking instructions, she submitted that the Applicant has no antecedents.

¶25

Perusal of the record shows that the incident in question took place on 31^st March 2023, the F.I.R. was lodged on 1^st April 2023, the Applicant was arrested on 2^nd April 2023 and the Charge-sheet was filed in July 2023. As per the Charge-sheet there are 20 witnesses proposed to be examined by the prosecution. There is no progress in the trial and even the Charge is not framed. Accordingly, the trial is likely to take a considerably long time. The Applicant is a young person aged 25 years and he is a Computer Science graduate.

¶26

Mr. Raut, learned Counsel for the Applicant states that as several witnesses are from Pune district, the Applicant will reside at Amgaon, District - Gondia.

¶27

The Applicant does not appear to be at risk of flight.

¶28

The Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents.

¶29

Accordingly, the Applicant can be enlarged on bail by imposing

conditions.

Page No. 3/5

Dusane

513 BA 924.24.doc

11. In view thereof, the following order:

¶35

O R D E R

¶36

(a) The Applicant - Komal Nitin Gautam be released on bail in connection with C.R. No.123 of 2023 registered with the Vadgaon Nimbalkar Police Station, Pune-Rural DistrictPune (presently-Supa Police Station) on his furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two local solvent sureties in the like amount.

¶37

(b) The Applicant shall not enter the Pune district after being released on bail, except for reporting to the Investigating Officer, if called, and for attending the trial.

¶38

(c) On being released on bail, the Applicant shall furnish his cell phone number and residential address to the Investigating Officer and shall keep the same updated, in case of any change thereto.

¶39

(d) The Applicant shall report to the Amgaon Police Station, District - Gondia once in two weeks i.e. on alternate Sundays between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. till the conclusion of the trial. The Police Inspector of Amgaon Police Station, District - Gondia to communicate details thereof to the Investigating Officer.

Page No. 4/5

Dusane

513 BA 924.24.doc

(e) The Applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat, or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such a person from disclosing the facts to the Court or to any Police personnel.

¶44

(f) The Applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and shall not contact or influence the Complainant or any prosecution witnesses in any manner.

¶45

(g) The Applicant shall attend the trial regularly. The Applicant shall co-operate with the Trial Court and shall not seek unnecessary adjournments thereat.

¶46

(h) The Applicant shall surrender his passport, if any, to the Investigating Officer.

¶47

The Bail Application is disposed of accordingly.

¶48

It is clarified that the Trial Court shall decide the case on its merits, uninfluenced by the prima facie observations made in this Order.

¶49

[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]

¶50

Page No. 5/5

¶51

Dusane

Komal Nitin Gautam v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Komal Nitin Gautam v. State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babasaheb Jaywant Wakde vs the Grievance Redressal Committee

Viva Divine Ventures vs Madhu Jeevan Jyoti Co-Operative Housing Society Limited

Sushant Ganesh Pujari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Manisha Mansing Bhosle vs Mansingh S. Bhosale and 4ORS

Keshav Balu Bhange Vs State of Maharashtra

Pandurang Balwant Jorwar Vs State of Maharashtra