The applicant, appearing through counsel, sought leave to withdraw his pending bail application. The Court granted the leave to withdraw and disposed of the application as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the bail application was granted; the application is disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
9. BA 844-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 844 OF 2023
Dhiraj Chandrakant Survase
.Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
.Respondent
Mr. Rushikesh Kale, Advocate, for the Applicant.
Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP, for the Respondent – State.
CORAM:MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATE:19.03.2024
P. C.
1. Mr. Kale, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks
leave to withdraw the Bail Application. Leave granted. He states that
he will file appropriate proceedings.
2. Accoridingly, the Bail Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page No.1
Anand
Dhiraj Chandrakant Survase
The State of Maharashtra
Madhav J. Jandjar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court