Bail applicant sought withdrawal of application but requested expedited trial due to incarceration. The High Court dismissed the withdrawn application and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
902-BA672-2024.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 672 OF 2024
Abdul Kalam Puttu Shah ...Applicant Versus State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Gaurav Bhawnani, for the Applicant. Mrs. Geeta Mulekar, APP for the State/Respondent No.1. PSI B. E. Satam, Meghwadi Police Station, present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 23rd FEBRUARY, 2024
PC:-
seeks leave to withdraw the application.
and period of incarceration, the learned Counsel submits the trial may be expedited.
No.255/2022 arising out of CR No.406/2021 is requested to
make an endeavoure to commence and conclude the trial as
expeditiously as possible.
1/1
Abdul Kalam Puttu Shah
State of Maharashtra
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
