In this bail application, the applicant sought withdrawal citing a framed charge. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn but directed the trial court to expedite the trial to conclude within nine months.
The bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within nine months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16-BA497-2023.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 497 OF 2023
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2024.01.29 12:51:31 +0530
Yudhveer Satbir Yadav
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra …Respondent
Mr. Niranjan Mundargi, i/b Omneel Jadhav, for the
Applicant. Mr. S. R. Aagarkar, APP for the State/Respondent. PSI Dhotre and SC Surve, AEC, DCB, CID, Mumbai, present.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED: 24th JANUARY, 2024
PC:-
that the prime witness Mohammad Ehtesham Mohd. Aslam Naviwala is an absconding accused and, therefore, the trial is not likely to commence.
that the said witness is protected by an order of the Court and the prosecution is in a position to examine the witness.
1/2
16-BA497-2023.DOC
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
2/2
Santosh Subhash Kulkarni
The State of Maharashtra
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
