Rutvik Amar Suryavanshi v. State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
Thin one-line order granting interim relief to state without hearing; no substantive legal principle or reasoning provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
139-BA-4647-24.DOC
Zeenat Pathan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4647 OF 2024
Rutvik Amar Suryawanshi ...Applicant
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents
Mr. Umesh Hanmantrao Pawar, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. S. S. Ghag, APP for State-Respondent.
CORAM:- ANIL S. KILOR, J.
DATED:- 11th NOVEMBER, 2024
PC:-
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
1/1
Rutvik Amar Suryawanshi
The State of Maharashtra
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court