Mohammed Amin Abdul Ejaj Shaikh v. the State of Maharashtra
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18-BA-4477-2024.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 4477 OF 2024
Mohammed Amin Abdul Ejaj Shaikh … Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra. …Respondent
Mr. Tejas Bhattacharya i/b Farheen Chaudhary for the applicant. Ms. Shilpa Gajare APP for the State.
CORAM: ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.
DATED: 29 NOVEMBER 2024
P.C.
- The learned Advocate Mr. Tejas Bhattacharya holding for the
applicant states that, the Advocate on record is in some personal difficulty today and request for time.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohammed Amin Abdul Ejaj Shaikh
- respondent
The State of Maharashtra
Coram
ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
12 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court