Regular bail under Section 439 CrPC in a double murder case arising from a sword, knife and stick assault over previous enmity; two victims died. The court found no reason for eyewitnesses to falsely implicate the applicant and, considering the gravity of the offence, rejected bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-ba-3833-23.doc
Digitally signed by DINESH DINESH SADANAND SADANAND SHERLA SHERLA Date: 2024.02.06 16:26:22 +0500
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3833 OF 2023
Tejaskumar @ Yalappa Gundappa Salunkhe @ Bhat ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr. Aniket Nikam a/w. Mr. Ashish Satpute i/b Mr. Amit Icham for the Applicant.
Ms Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent.
CORAM : N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 3 FEBRUARY 2024.
PC:-
1/3
Dinesh S. Sherla
10-ba-3833-23.doc
succumbed to the injuries sustained by them in the alleged incident.
2/3
Dinesh S. Sherla
10-ba-3833-23.doc
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
3/3
Dinesh S. Sherla
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail under Section 439 CrPC in a double murder case where medical evidence is said to be inconsistent with eyewitness accounts.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Tejaskumar @ Yalappa Gundappa Salunkhe @ Bhat
The State of Maharashtra
N. R. Borkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court