Respondent granted bail. CGPAW. The High Court dismissed the bail application, directing the applicant to file a fresh bail application before the Trial Court. The Trial Court was directed to decide it on merits within 8 days.
Directing applicant to move fresh bail application before Trial Court which decided within 8 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:BHC-AUG:7505
1 81 BA.381.2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
81 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 381 OF 2024
GAUTAM DILIP MHASKE AND ANOTHER VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. N. B. Narwade, h/f Mr. S. D. Jaybhar. APP for Respondent/State : Mrs. Pratibha J. Bharad.
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 08th April, 2024.
P.C.:
1 The learned counsel for applicant pointed out the order passed by the Trial Court dated 5th April, 2024 by which co-accused is released on bail. Now, the charge-sheet is filed during the pendency of this application. The learned counsel for applicant prayed for bail on the ground of parity.
nga
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should grant bail in a case where the charge-sheet is filed only after the High Court bail application is pending?
GAUTAM DILIP MHASKE AND ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
